<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 475 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170649</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, the civil appeal was admitted, and it was directed to be tagged with Civil Appeal No. 3234 of 2011. The order records no substantive ruling on the central excise dispute and contains no determination on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 475 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170649</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, the civil appeal was admitted, and it was directed to be tagged with Civil Appeal No. 3234 of 2011. The order records no substantive ruling on the central excise dispute and contains no determination on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>