https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260265 In a stay application, the Tribunal found no prima facie breach of natural justice because the applicant had not attended opportunities before the adjudicating authority, had not identified the withheld documents, and had not shown prejudice from non-supply. On the merits, the record indicated prima facie involvement in firm registration, misleading verification reports, and processing linked to credit availment and rebate claims, so a complete stay without deposit was not justified. The Tribunal tentatively treated Rule 26 as applicable and granted only partial interim relief by directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 5,00,000, with recovery of the remaining penalty stayed on compliance. en-us Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260265 In a stay application, the Tribunal found no prima facie breach of natural justice because the applicant had not attended opportunities before the adjudicating authority, had not identified the withheld documents, and had not shown prejudice from non-supply. On the merits, the record indicated prima facie involvement in firm registration, misleading verification reports, and processing linked to credit availment and rebate claims, so a complete stay without deposit was not justified. The Tribunal tentatively treated Rule 26 as applicable and granted only partial interim relief by directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 5,00,000, with recovery of the remaining penalty stayed on compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260265