<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1175 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170627</link>
    <description>A civil appeal was dismissed solely for delay in filing, and the Court did not condone the delay or examine the merits. The only operative determination was procedural: limitation barred consideration of the underlying dispute, so no substantive issue was adjudicated. The dismissal therefore ended the appeal on grounds of delay alone, without any ruling on the merits of the controversy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:53:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1175 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170627</link>
      <description>A civil appeal was dismissed solely for delay in filing, and the Court did not condone the delay or examine the merits. The only operative determination was procedural: limitation barred consideration of the underlying dispute, so no substantive issue was adjudicated. The dismissal therefore ended the appeal on grounds of delay alone, without any ruling on the merits of the controversy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>