<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 162 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260237</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order confirming service tax and penalty, directing the petitioner to pursue an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal without the requirement of depositing 7.5% tax amount. The court held that the petitioner, whose case began in 2013, was not bound by the 2014 amendment mandating the deposit. The petitioner was allowed to file an appeal under the pre-amendment provisions, with the option to seek waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The court emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s duty to consider the waiver application and proceed with the appeal on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:31:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 162 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260237</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order confirming service tax and penalty, directing the petitioner to pursue an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal without the requirement of depositing 7.5% tax amount. The court held that the petitioner, whose case began in 2013, was not bound by the 2014 amendment mandating the deposit. The petitioner was allowed to file an appeal under the pre-amendment provisions, with the option to seek waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The court emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s duty to consider the waiver application and proceed with the appeal on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>