https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260222 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the land was not liable for wealth tax due to ongoing construction activities. The issue regarding the treatment of productive assets was remanded back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for proper consideration. en-us Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:27:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260222 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the land was not liable for wealth tax due to ongoing construction activities. The issue regarding the treatment of productive assets was remanded back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for proper consideration. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260222