<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 146 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260221</link>
    <description>For deduction under section 80-IA, earlier years&#039; losses and deductions that had already been set off against other income could not be notionally brought forward again to reduce the profits of the eligible business. The Madras HC treated section 80-IA(5) as a special computation provision creating a limited fiction for the initial assessment year and subsequent years, but not authorising recomputation of losses from years preceding the initial year after those losses had already been absorbed. The assessee was therefore entitled to claim the deduction without reintroducing those earlier set-off losses, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:25:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 146 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260221</link>
      <description>For deduction under section 80-IA, earlier years&#039; losses and deductions that had already been set off against other income could not be notionally brought forward again to reduce the profits of the eligible business. The Madras HC treated section 80-IA(5) as a special computation provision creating a limited fiction for the initial assessment year and subsequent years, but not authorising recomputation of losses from years preceding the initial year after those losses had already been absorbed. The assessee was therefore entitled to claim the deduction without reintroducing those earlier set-off losses, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>