<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 558 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170614</link>
    <description>Central excise dispute reached the SC, which found no reason to interfere with the impugned decision and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The order records no separate legal reasoning on the merits, so the operative effect is limited to refusal of interference by the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 12:50:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 558 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170614</link>
      <description>Central excise dispute reached the SC, which found no reason to interfere with the impugned decision and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The order records no separate legal reasoning on the merits, so the operative effect is limited to refusal of interference by the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>