<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 160 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170605</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging show cause notices, upholding the respondents&#039; objection on maintainability. It emphasized that writ proceedings are not a substitute for responding to such notices unless they are totally invalid. The court found the notices issued within the authority&#039;s jurisdiction based on prima facie material. Allegations of discrimination were not upheld, and compliance with natural justice principles was acknowledged. Disputed facts were deemed for adjudication by the authority, leading to the dismissal of the petitions and directing the petitioner to respond to the notices for proper adjudication based on law and facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:18:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 160 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170605</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging show cause notices, upholding the respondents&#039; objection on maintainability. It emphasized that writ proceedings are not a substitute for responding to such notices unless they are totally invalid. The court found the notices issued within the authority&#039;s jurisdiction based on prima facie material. Allegations of discrimination were not upheld, and compliance with natural justice principles was acknowledged. Disputed facts were deemed for adjudication by the authority, leading to the dismissal of the petitions and directing the petitioner to respond to the notices for proper adjudication based on law and facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>