https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170603 The High Court of Bombay dismissed a petition challenging a CESTAT order, holding duty chargeable under the Central Excise Act on clandestine removals. The Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226, emphasizing parties should use available appeals, especially when the appeal lies before the Supreme Court. The petition was dismissed without costs. en-us Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jun 2015 13:06:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170603 The High Court of Bombay dismissed a petition challenging a CESTAT order, holding duty chargeable under the Central Excise Act on clandestine removals. The Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226, emphasizing parties should use available appeals, especially when the appeal lies before the Supreme Court. The petition was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170603