https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260191 The court dismissed the writ petitions, affirming that "Zn-dross" with more than 96% Zinc content is excisable under the amended tariff entry. It upheld the legality of the Orders-in-Original and subsequent appellate decisions, emphasizing the availability of High Court's writ jurisdiction under Article 226 to prevent miscarriage of justice, even when alternative remedies exist. The court distinguished the present case based on the high Zinc content of the product, rejecting reliance on previous judgments and circulars. en-us Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260191 The court dismissed the writ petitions, affirming that "Zn-dross" with more than 96% Zinc content is excisable under the amended tariff entry. It upheld the legality of the Orders-in-Original and subsequent appellate decisions, emphasizing the availability of High Court's writ jurisdiction under Article 226 to prevent miscarriage of justice, even when alternative remedies exist. The court distinguished the present case based on the high Zinc content of the product, rejecting reliance on previous judgments and circulars. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260191