https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170598 The Government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to allow the rebate claim for excise duty paid on goods exported, despite discrepancies in product descriptions. The Government considered the documentary evidence provided by the respondent, including customs certification on export documents, as sufficient proof that the goods cleared were indeed exported. The revision application challenging the appellate authority's decision was rejected for lacking merit. en-us Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:05:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170598 The Government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to allow the rebate claim for excise duty paid on goods exported, despite discrepancies in product descriptions. The Government considered the documentary evidence provided by the respondent, including customs certification on export documents, as sufficient proof that the goods cleared were indeed exported. The revision application challenging the appellate authority's decision was rejected for lacking merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170598