https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170594 The tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous applications seeking rectification of the stay order under Section 35F, as they were not covered under the scope of Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The tribunal clarified that Section 35C(2) allows rectification of mistakes in final orders under Section 35C(1), not stay orders under Section 35F. The absence of the appellant during the proceedings led the tribunal to proceed with the applications on merit. en-us Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 May 2017 09:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170594 The tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous applications seeking rectification of the stay order under Section 35F, as they were not covered under the scope of Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The tribunal clarified that Section 35C(2) allows rectification of mistakes in final orders under Section 35C(1), not stay orders under Section 35F. The absence of the appellant during the proceedings led the tribunal to proceed with the applications on merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170594