<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 86 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260161</link>
    <description>Nomination under the Companies Act, the Depositories Act and similar enactments was held to secure valid discharge to the company or depository on payment or transmission, but not to create beneficial ownership in the nominee or displace succession rights. The nominee may receive the asset, yet holds it subject to the rights of heirs or legatees under the applicable succession law. The earlier contrary view was treated as per incuriam because it overlooked binding Supreme Court and High Court authority. The settled position confirmed that nomination is not a third mode of succession and does not vest exclusive title in the nominee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 86 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260161</link>
      <description>Nomination under the Companies Act, the Depositories Act and similar enactments was held to secure valid discharge to the company or depository on payment or transmission, but not to create beneficial ownership in the nominee or displace succession rights. The nominee may receive the asset, yet holds it subject to the rights of heirs or legatees under the applicable succession law. The earlier contrary view was treated as per incuriam because it overlooked binding Supreme Court and High Court authority. The settled position confirmed that nomination is not a third mode of succession and does not vest exclusive title in the nominee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>