<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1047 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170585</link>
    <description>The Department appealed against a refund order granted to a manufacturer of Colour TV receiver parts for exported products. The Department argued that the manufacturer could have used the credit and there was no justification for the refund. However, the Original Authority and Commissioner (Appeals) found the manufacturer met the requirements for the refund under Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal upheld the decision, stating that the manufacturer was entitled to the refund as they fulfilled the necessary conditions, and rejected the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:43:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1047 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170585</link>
      <description>The Department appealed against a refund order granted to a manufacturer of Colour TV receiver parts for exported products. The Department argued that the manufacturer could have used the credit and there was no justification for the refund. However, the Original Authority and Commissioner (Appeals) found the manufacturer met the requirements for the refund under Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal upheld the decision, stating that the manufacturer was entitled to the refund as they fulfilled the necessary conditions, and rejected the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>