https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170587 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore clarified that legal proceedings, such as an appeal by a company under liquidation, can continue without court permission under Section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Tribunal emphasized that proceedings initiated by the company itself do not require court leave, distinguishing them from actions directly against the company. The decision aimed to dispel misconceptions and ensure transparency, leading to the adjournment of the hearing and notification of the Official Liquidator for awareness and procedural adherence. en-us Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:53:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170587 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore clarified that legal proceedings, such as an appeal by a company under liquidation, can continue without court permission under Section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Tribunal emphasized that proceedings initiated by the company itself do not require court leave, distinguishing them from actions directly against the company. The decision aimed to dispel misconceptions and ensure transparency, leading to the adjournment of the hearing and notification of the Official Liquidator for awareness and procedural adherence. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170587