<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 75 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, following the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Bombay&#039;s judgment, upheld the validity of the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court&#039;s decision regarding the excisability of Aluminium Dross. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, with the stay application also being disposed of. The judgment reiterated the importance of adhering to established legal principles and respecting binding Supreme Court decisions in matters of excise duty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 75 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, following the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Bombay&#039;s judgment, upheld the validity of the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court&#039;s decision regarding the excisability of Aluminium Dross. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, with the stay application also being disposed of. The judgment reiterated the importance of adhering to established legal principles and respecting binding Supreme Court decisions in matters of excise duty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>