<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 963 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, waiving the pre-deposit requirement until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The appellants were found prima facie eligible for exemption based on the interpretation of relevant laws and notifications regarding duty liability on various products, credit on inputs, and exemption eligibility under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal&#039;s decision considered the reversal of proportionate credit for exempted products and the definition of &quot;factory&quot; under different acts in support of the appellants&#039; case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 17:30:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 963 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, waiving the pre-deposit requirement until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The appellants were found prima facie eligible for exemption based on the interpretation of relevant laws and notifications regarding duty liability on various products, credit on inputs, and exemption eligibility under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal&#039;s decision considered the reversal of proportionate credit for exempted products and the definition of &quot;factory&quot; under different acts in support of the appellants&#039; case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>