<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 789 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the need for the Adjudicating Authority to consider the appellant&#039;s application and issue an appropriate order in line with the Finance Act, 2010. The Tribunal directed a fresh examination to ensure compliance with Section 73 of the Act, allowing the appellant to reapply for Cenvat credit on inputs for exempted goods under the specified provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 17:58:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 789 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the need for the Adjudicating Authority to consider the appellant&#039;s application and issue an appropriate order in line with the Finance Act, 2010. The Tribunal directed a fresh examination to ensure compliance with Section 73 of the Act, allowing the appellant to reapply for Cenvat credit on inputs for exempted goods under the specified provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>