<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1042 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170579</link>
    <description>The appellants successfully challenged the benefit denial under specific notifications due to alleged lack of required content in their product. Despite discrepancies in test reports, an expert report supported by invoices indicated compliance with the composition requirements. The court found the appellants&#039; evidence credible, warranting a waiver of the amount demanded until the resolution of the appeals. This case underscores the importance of accurate testing, thorough investigations, and documentation to substantiate claims in legal proceedings and ensure compliance with statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 18:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1042 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170579</link>
      <description>The appellants successfully challenged the benefit denial under specific notifications due to alleged lack of required content in their product. Despite discrepancies in test reports, an expert report supported by invoices indicated compliance with the composition requirements. The court found the appellants&#039; evidence credible, warranting a waiver of the amount demanded until the resolution of the appeals. This case underscores the importance of accurate testing, thorough investigations, and documentation to substantiate claims in legal proceedings and ensure compliance with statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>