<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1008 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170562</link>
    <description>Clearances of goods manufactured by independent job workers could not be clubbed with the appellant&#039;s own clearances for denial of small scale exemption because the job workers were genuine manufacturers and the appellant&#039;s supply of raw material did not make it the excise manufacturer. The appellant&#039;s own production was separately accounted for, so there was no basis to aggregate the clearances. Affixing the brand name by stencil in the godown was not a manufacturing activity. The resulting demand of duty and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:33:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1008 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170562</link>
      <description>Clearances of goods manufactured by independent job workers could not be clubbed with the appellant&#039;s own clearances for denial of small scale exemption because the job workers were genuine manufacturers and the appellant&#039;s supply of raw material did not make it the excise manufacturer. The appellant&#039;s own production was separately accounted for, so there was no basis to aggregate the clearances. Affixing the brand name by stencil in the godown was not a manufacturing activity. The resulting demand of duty and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>