<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 788 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170553</link>
    <description>Duty set-off under Notification No. 225/86-C.E. was held admissible for MEG used to manufacture PSF cleared without duty under Rule 191BB for export-linked production, because such clearance was not treated as clearance of exempted goods and was to be read on the same footing as export clearances under bond. The separate objection based on alleged short receipt of MEG also failed, as the quantities across the bills of entry were reconciled and no net shortage remained. On that basis, the disallowance of set-off was not sustained and the Revenue&#039;s claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:44:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 788 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170553</link>
      <description>Duty set-off under Notification No. 225/86-C.E. was held admissible for MEG used to manufacture PSF cleared without duty under Rule 191BB for export-linked production, because such clearance was not treated as clearance of exempted goods and was to be read on the same footing as export clearances under bond. The separate objection based on alleged short receipt of MEG also failed, as the quantities across the bills of entry were reconciled and no net shortage remained. On that basis, the disallowance of set-off was not sustained and the Revenue&#039;s claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>