<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 911 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170556</link>
    <description>When admitted short-payment of central excise duty is established, the differential duty and interest should ordinarily be confirmed to that extent, with amounts already paid during investigation appropriated against the liability. A demand should not be dropped mechanically where the record indicates short-payment and the period requires proper factual examination. On penalty, revenue neutrality is not, by itself, a complete answer; applicability of penalty under Section 11AC depends on the same factual foundation used for the duty demand, including any material bearing on intent to evade. The article stresses that both duty and penalty require fresh, reasoned adjudication on the relevant facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:58:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 911 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170556</link>
      <description>When admitted short-payment of central excise duty is established, the differential duty and interest should ordinarily be confirmed to that extent, with amounts already paid during investigation appropriated against the liability. A demand should not be dropped mechanically where the record indicates short-payment and the period requires proper factual examination. On penalty, revenue neutrality is not, by itself, a complete answer; applicability of penalty under Section 11AC depends on the same factual foundation used for the duty demand, including any material bearing on intent to evade. The article stresses that both duty and penalty require fresh, reasoned adjudication on the relevant facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>