<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 745 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170557</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that post-2007, &#039;LCD panels/modules&#039; are classified under Heading 8529, while pre-2007, the earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s favor under Heading 9013 applied. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit a reduced duty amount within a specified timeframe for goods imported post-2007, with leniency shown for goods imported pre-2007, setting a reduced pre-deposit amount. Compliance was required by a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:02:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 745 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170557</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that post-2007, &#039;LCD panels/modules&#039; are classified under Heading 8529, while pre-2007, the earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s favor under Heading 9013 applied. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit a reduced duty amount within a specified timeframe for goods imported post-2007, with leniency shown for goods imported pre-2007, setting a reduced pre-deposit amount. Compliance was required by a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>