<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1007 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170560</link>
    <description>Rule 57AC(2)(c) governed transitional CENVAT credit for capital goods received before 1 April 2000 but installed later, so entitlement had to be determined by the position on the date of receipt. The text states that the Supreme Court clarification supported availability of relief under Rule 57AC(2)(c), but did not permit a fresh 50% entitlement in the second year or a 100% credit approach. The total admissible credit remained 75% of duty at receipt, and the amount claimable in 2001-2002 was only the balance after credit already taken in the first year, with recomputation left to the original adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:15:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1007 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170560</link>
      <description>Rule 57AC(2)(c) governed transitional CENVAT credit for capital goods received before 1 April 2000 but installed later, so entitlement had to be determined by the position on the date of receipt. The text states that the Supreme Court clarification supported availability of relief under Rule 57AC(2)(c), but did not permit a fresh 50% entitlement in the second year or a 100% credit approach. The total admissible credit remained 75% of duty at receipt, and the amount claimable in 2001-2002 was only the balance after credit already taken in the first year, with recomputation left to the original adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>