<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1010 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170535</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the show cause notice lacked essential facts for proper defense and that the adjudicating authority exceeded its scope. Emphasizing the importance of specificity in show cause notices, the tribunal held that the absence of crucial details invalidated the proceedings. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and granted relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 17:16:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1010 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170535</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the show cause notice lacked essential facts for proper defense and that the adjudicating authority exceeded its scope. Emphasizing the importance of specificity in show cause notices, the tribunal held that the absence of crucial details invalidated the proceedings. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and granted relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>