<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1461 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170539</link>
    <description>A 100% EOU making DTA clearances under paragraph 6.8(h) of the Foreign Trade Policy could claim Sl. No. 1 of Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. because that entry applies to goods manufactured in an EOU and brought into India in accordance with the Policy, subject only to its own condition that the goods are not exempt from sales tax or VAT. Sl. No. 2 was treated as limited to DTA clearances within the entitlement under paragraph 6.8(a), (d), (e) and (g), and no restriction was read into Sl. No. 1 from that entry or from the Development Commissioner&#039;s limit. On that basis, a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was made out and stay was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 17:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1461 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170539</link>
      <description>A 100% EOU making DTA clearances under paragraph 6.8(h) of the Foreign Trade Policy could claim Sl. No. 1 of Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. because that entry applies to goods manufactured in an EOU and brought into India in accordance with the Policy, subject only to its own condition that the goods are not exempt from sales tax or VAT. Sl. No. 2 was treated as limited to DTA clearances within the entitlement under paragraph 6.8(a), (d), (e) and (g), and no restriction was read into Sl. No. 1 from that entry or from the Development Commissioner&#039;s limit. On that basis, a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was made out and stay was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>