<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1037 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170542</link>
    <description>Interest demanded on additional consideration collected through supplementary invoices after price escalation was held time-barred. The dispute turned on limitation, with the assessee showing a bona fide belief that no interest was payable while earlier Tribunal and High Court views remained in its favour. Once the legal position was later clarified against the assessee, the prior contrary judicial support was treated as relevant to the limitation defence. The interest demand was therefore set aside as barred by limitation, while the assessee succeeded on that issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:12:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1037 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170542</link>
      <description>Interest demanded on additional consideration collected through supplementary invoices after price escalation was held time-barred. The dispute turned on limitation, with the assessee showing a bona fide belief that no interest was payable while earlier Tribunal and High Court views remained in its favour. Once the legal position was later clarified against the assessee, the prior contrary judicial support was treated as relevant to the limitation defence. The interest demand was therefore set aside as barred by limitation, while the assessee succeeded on that issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>