<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 930 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against the demand of excise duty, interest, and penalty for non-separate indication of freight amount in excise invoices. The case involved a manufacturer of LPG Cylinders supplying to oil companies, with the Tribunal noting that the freight collected matched actual costs and was clearly mentioned in purchase orders. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the importance of proper indication of freight costs in commercial bills and purchase orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:15:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 930 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against the demand of excise duty, interest, and penalty for non-separate indication of freight amount in excise invoices. The case involved a manufacturer of LPG Cylinders supplying to oil companies, with the Tribunal noting that the freight collected matched actual costs and was clearly mentioned in purchase orders. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the importance of proper indication of freight costs in commercial bills and purchase orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>