<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 48 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260123</link>
    <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay, subject to costs, and quashed the impugned order. The Second Appeal was restored to the Tribunal for a decision on its merits. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the circumstances and bonafide beliefs of parties in condonation cases to ensure justice is not denied due to procedural errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 48 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260123</link>
      <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay, subject to costs, and quashed the impugned order. The Second Appeal was restored to the Tribunal for a decision on its merits. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the circumstances and bonafide beliefs of parties in condonation cases to ensure justice is not denied due to procedural errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>