<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 45 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260120</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that National Calamity Contingency Duty (NCCD) is not leviable on captively consumed Partially Oriented Yarn (POY) based on precedents like Modern Petrofils Ltd. The decision aligned with previous findings that NCCD does not apply to captive consumption scenarios for goods exempted under Notification No.46/2003-CE, granting consequential relief to the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 45 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260120</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that National Calamity Contingency Duty (NCCD) is not leviable on captively consumed Partially Oriented Yarn (POY) based on precedents like Modern Petrofils Ltd. The decision aligned with previous findings that NCCD does not apply to captive consumption scenarios for goods exempted under Notification No.46/2003-CE, granting consequential relief to the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>