<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 43 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260118</link>
    <description>A beneficial exemption notification was applied to diesel generating sets supplied for a project, and the exemption was allowed because the decisive requirement was that the goods be supplied towards a financed and approved project. The fact that delivery was made to the executing agency rather than directly to the project implementing authority did not defeat the exemption, since the supply certificate and later confirmation established that the goods were in fact supplied for and installed in the project. A restrictive condition not found in the notification could not be read into it, so the Revenue&#039;s objection failed and the demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 43 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260118</link>
      <description>A beneficial exemption notification was applied to diesel generating sets supplied for a project, and the exemption was allowed because the decisive requirement was that the goods be supplied towards a financed and approved project. The fact that delivery was made to the executing agency rather than directly to the project implementing authority did not defeat the exemption, since the supply certificate and later confirmation established that the goods were in fact supplied for and installed in the project. A restrictive condition not found in the notification could not be read into it, so the Revenue&#039;s objection failed and the demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>