<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 34 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the disallowance of Rs. 11,51,111 under section 36(1)(viii) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee, a Co-operative Bank, failed to create a special reserve in its books of account for the relevant financial year, leading to the disallowance. The request to create the reserve post-facto was rejected, emphasizing the requirement to create the reserve before claiming the deduction. The appeal was dismissed, and the disallowance was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 07:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 34 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the disallowance of Rs. 11,51,111 under section 36(1)(viii) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee, a Co-operative Bank, failed to create a special reserve in its books of account for the relevant financial year, leading to the disallowance. The request to create the reserve post-facto was rejected, emphasizing the requirement to create the reserve before claiming the deduction. The appeal was dismissed, and the disallowance was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>