<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 25 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the compensation payment as a revenue expenditure, allowing it under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the payment related to supplies and lacked enduring benefit to the appellant, supporting its revenue nature. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 06:00:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 25 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the compensation payment as a revenue expenditure, allowing it under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the payment related to supplies and lacked enduring benefit to the appellant, supporting its revenue nature. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>