<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 722 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170520</link>
    <description>NCCD was held not leviable on clearances of partially oriented yarn for captive consumption, the Tribunal treating the issue as settled and accepting the existing legal position that the levy could not survive on such removals. The same principle was applied to clearances made to 100% export-oriented units, following the ratio relied on for analogous exempt clearances, and the levy was again negatived. As a result, the demand for NCCD, together with interest and penalties, did not survive and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 722 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170520</link>
      <description>NCCD was held not leviable on clearances of partially oriented yarn for captive consumption, the Tribunal treating the issue as settled and accepting the existing legal position that the levy could not survive on such removals. The same principle was applied to clearances made to 100% export-oriented units, following the ratio relied on for analogous exempt clearances, and the levy was again negatived. As a result, the demand for NCCD, together with interest and penalties, did not survive and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>