<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 19 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260094</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed in the case concerning Cenvat credit of service tax. The Tribunal denied the credit for air travel, travel insurance, and vehicle insurance due to lack of connection with the services provided. However, the credit for mediclaim for employees and CHA services was permitted as they were deemed integral to securing employee services and providing output services. The stay application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 19 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260094</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed in the case concerning Cenvat credit of service tax. The Tribunal denied the credit for air travel, travel insurance, and vehicle insurance due to lack of connection with the services provided. However, the credit for mediclaim for employees and CHA services was permitted as they were deemed integral to securing employee services and providing output services. The stay application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>