<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 14 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260089</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, emphasizing equity and fairness due to the minimal delay in depositing required amounts and pending extension application when the appeal was dismissed. The Court interpreted relevant provisions to grant CESTAT jurisdiction to restore appeals and highlighted the need to secure justice. The appeal was restored for a hearing on merits, underscoring the importance of ensuring fairness in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 14 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260089</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, emphasizing equity and fairness due to the minimal delay in depositing required amounts and pending extension application when the appeal was dismissed. The Court interpreted relevant provisions to grant CESTAT jurisdiction to restore appeals and highlighted the need to secure justice. The appeal was restored for a hearing on merits, underscoring the importance of ensuring fairness in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>