<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 11 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260086</link>
    <description>In a proposed amalgamation involving a holding company and its wholly owned subsidiary, the court noted that the transferor company&#039;s equity shareholders and unsecured creditors had given written consent and that there were no secured creditors. Because no shares were to be issued in consideration, no change in control or management would arise, and neither shareholders&#039; rights nor creditors&#039; interests would be prejudiced. On that basis, the meetings of the transferor company&#039;s equity shareholders and unsecured creditors were dispensed with, and the transferee company was exempted from approaching the jurisdictional High Court for separate sanction proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 11 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260086</link>
      <description>In a proposed amalgamation involving a holding company and its wholly owned subsidiary, the court noted that the transferor company&#039;s equity shareholders and unsecured creditors had given written consent and that there were no secured creditors. Because no shares were to be issued in consideration, no change in control or management would arise, and neither shareholders&#039; rights nor creditors&#039; interests would be prejudiced. On that basis, the meetings of the transferor company&#039;s equity shareholders and unsecured creditors were dispensed with, and the transferee company was exempted from approaching the jurisdictional High Court for separate sanction proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>