<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 3 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260078</link>
    <description>The appeal involved the denial of exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act to a non-profit educational institution managed by ICRISAT. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied the exemption due to alleged violations of terms set by the Ministry of External Affairs and the Department of Agricultural Research &amp;amp; Education. The AO also cited the collection of a capitation fee as a profit motive, disqualifying the institution from exemption. The ITAT remanded the matter back to the AO for further examination of the prescribed fee structure and directed a fresh decision based on the evidence presented by the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the case was remanded for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 3 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260078</link>
      <description>The appeal involved the denial of exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act to a non-profit educational institution managed by ICRISAT. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied the exemption due to alleged violations of terms set by the Ministry of External Affairs and the Department of Agricultural Research &amp;amp; Education. The AO also cited the collection of a capitation fee as a profit motive, disqualifying the institution from exemption. The ITAT remanded the matter back to the AO for further examination of the prescribed fee structure and directed a fresh decision based on the evidence presented by the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the case was remanded for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>