https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170516 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals with consequential relief. It held that the Department failed to establish clandestine manufacture and clearance of finished goods due to inconsistencies in evidence, including retracted statements and production capacity discrepancies. The judgment highlighted the necessity of considering retracted statements, production capacity, and the right to cross-examination in cases involving allegations of clandestine removal. en-us Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170516 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals with consequential relief. It held that the Department failed to establish clandestine manufacture and clearance of finished goods due to inconsistencies in evidence, including retracted statements and production capacity discrepancies. The judgment highlighted the necessity of considering retracted statements, production capacity, and the right to cross-examination in cases involving allegations of clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170516