https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170512 Review under the repealed Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 remained governed by the saving provisions in the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the General Clauses Act, 1897, preserving the earlier rights, liabilities and remedies. The Tribunal held that review jurisdiction is confined to correction of a patent error apparent on the face of the record or a clerical mistake, and cannot be used to reargue the merits or function as an appeal in disguise. As the applicant sought a fresh consideration of factual and legal issues without showing any apparent error in the earlier order, no ground for review was established and the petition was rejected. en-us Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jun 2015 14:56:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170512 Review under the repealed Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 remained governed by the saving provisions in the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the General Clauses Act, 1897, preserving the earlier rights, liabilities and remedies. The Tribunal held that review jurisdiction is confined to correction of a patent error apparent on the face of the record or a clerical mistake, and cannot be used to reargue the merits or function as an appeal in disguise. As the applicant sought a fresh consideration of factual and legal issues without showing any apparent error in the earlier order, no ground for review was established and the petition was rejected. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170512