<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 157 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170514</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the original adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, confirming the demand of duty, confiscation of goods, and imposition of penalties, rejecting the appeals filed by M/s. Jesons Industries Ltd. The case involved the appellant importing goods claiming concessional duty under a specific notification, but it was later found that the goods were not of the claimed origin, leading to the denial of the benefit and imposition of penalties for fraud and misdeclaration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:16:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 157 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170514</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the original adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, confirming the demand of duty, confiscation of goods, and imposition of penalties, rejecting the appeals filed by M/s. Jesons Industries Ltd. The case involved the appellant importing goods claiming concessional duty under a specific notification, but it was later found that the goods were not of the claimed origin, leading to the denial of the benefit and imposition of penalties for fraud and misdeclaration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>