<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 504 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170509</link>
    <description>Duty-paid returned goods received in the factory under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 can qualify for CENVAT credit when the prescribed conditions are satisfied. Where the record showed that the returned goods were duty paid and the Rule 16 requirements were complied with, denial of credit was unwarranted. On that basis, recovery under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 was not justified and the demand for reversal could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 504 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170509</link>
      <description>Duty-paid returned goods received in the factory under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 can qualify for CENVAT credit when the prescribed conditions are satisfied. Where the record showed that the returned goods were duty paid and the Rule 16 requirements were complied with, denial of credit was unwarranted. On that basis, recovery under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 was not justified and the demand for reversal could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>