<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 503 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170508</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh consideration, setting aside the impugned order except for the disallowance of CENVAT credit of Rs. 79,453.00 and the corresponding penalty, which were not contested by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of records to verify the proper accounting of inputs from the log-yard to the factory. The appeals were partly allowed by way of remand, keeping all other issues open for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 14:24:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 503 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170508</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh consideration, setting aside the impugned order except for the disallowance of CENVAT credit of Rs. 79,453.00 and the corresponding penalty, which were not contested by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of records to verify the proper accounting of inputs from the log-yard to the factory. The appeals were partly allowed by way of remand, keeping all other issues open for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>