https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170477 The revision applications were successful as the Government allowed the input rebate claim for duty paid on inputs used in manufacturing export goods. Despite procedural lapses, the Government found that the substantial benefit of the input rebate claim could not be denied, as the necessary approvals were obtained post-export. The Government set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and held the input rebate claim admissible under Central Excise Rules and Notification No. 21/2004-C.E. (N.T.). en-us Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 May 2015 14:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170477 The revision applications were successful as the Government allowed the input rebate claim for duty paid on inputs used in manufacturing export goods. Despite procedural lapses, the Government found that the substantial benefit of the input rebate claim could not be denied, as the necessary approvals were obtained post-export. The Government set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and held the input rebate claim admissible under Central Excise Rules and Notification No. 21/2004-C.E. (N.T.). Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170477