<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 795 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170489</link>
    <description>The revision application succeeded as the Government reinstated the initial Order-in-Original, rejecting the rebate claim for goods exported after the six-month period without seeking permission. The Central Government emphasized the statutory requirement of compliance with the prescribed timeline for rebate claims, leading to the restoration of the original order denying the rebate claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 14:37:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 795 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170489</link>
      <description>The revision application succeeded as the Government reinstated the initial Order-in-Original, rejecting the rebate claim for goods exported after the six-month period without seeking permission. The Central Government emphasized the statutory requirement of compliance with the prescribed timeline for rebate claims, leading to the restoration of the original order denying the rebate claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>