<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 689 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170493</link>
    <description>The government upheld the original rebate claim decision but directed that any excess duty paid should be treated as a voluntary deposit and re-credited in the Cenvat account. The Orders-in-Appeal were modified accordingly, and all revision applications were disposed of in these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 14:49:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 689 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170493</link>
      <description>The government upheld the original rebate claim decision but directed that any excess duty paid should be treated as a voluntary deposit and re-credited in the Cenvat account. The Orders-in-Appeal were modified accordingly, and all revision applications were disposed of in these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>