<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1003 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170500</link>
    <description>The Government concluded that the rebate of duty should be based on the FOB value, not the CIF value. The excess amount paid by the applicant should be allowed as a recredit in the Cenvat credit account. The impugned order-in-appeal was modified accordingly, and the revision application was disposed of on these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 10:47:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1003 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170500</link>
      <description>The Government concluded that the rebate of duty should be based on the FOB value, not the CIF value. The excess amount paid by the applicant should be allowed as a recredit in the Cenvat credit account. The impugned order-in-appeal was modified accordingly, and the revision application was disposed of on these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>