https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260067 The appeal was dismissed as it was filed beyond the permissible period of 120 days, exceeding the statutory limit set by Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956. The court lacked jurisdiction to condone the delay beyond this limit, emphasizing the strict adherence to specific limitation periods in special statutes. The application of Section 14 of the Limitation Act was rejected, as it does not apply to appeals under special statutes, reinforcing the principle that courts cannot extend limitation periods beyond what is expressly provided. en-us Mon, 04 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 May 2015 14:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260067 The appeal was dismissed as it was filed beyond the permissible period of 120 days, exceeding the statutory limit set by Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956. The court lacked jurisdiction to condone the delay beyond this limit, emphasizing the strict adherence to specific limitation periods in special statutes. The application of Section 14 of the Limitation Act was rejected, as it does not apply to appeals under special statutes, reinforcing the principle that courts cannot extend limitation periods beyond what is expressly provided. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 04 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260067