<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 938 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260064</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to exclude the period of involuntary stay from the residential status calculation for the assessee. The court affirmed the deletions and directions given by the ITAT, emphasizing the need to assess each case individually, especially concerning claims of involuntary stay. The appeals were dismissed, and each party was responsible for their costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 938 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260064</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to exclude the period of involuntary stay from the residential status calculation for the assessee. The court affirmed the deletions and directions given by the ITAT, emphasizing the need to assess each case individually, especially concerning claims of involuntary stay. The appeals were dismissed, and each party was responsible for their costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>