https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260060 The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, finding the Writ Petition premature as no adverse order had been issued yet. The Petitioner was directed to await the conclusion of reassessment proceedings and challenge any unfavorable decisions through Appeals. The Court instructed the Assessing Officer to address the Petitioner's objections during reassessment and ordered a four-week delay in acting on any prejudicial orders to allow the Petitioner to seek protective measures. The Writ Petition was disposed of with an emphasis on concluding reassessment proceedings before challenging adverse decisions and providing avenues for protective relief if needed. en-us Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 May 2015 11:16:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260060 The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, finding the Writ Petition premature as no adverse order had been issued yet. The Petitioner was directed to await the conclusion of reassessment proceedings and challenge any unfavorable decisions through Appeals. The Court instructed the Assessing Officer to address the Petitioner's objections during reassessment and ordered a four-week delay in acting on any prejudicial orders to allow the Petitioner to seek protective measures. The Writ Petition was disposed of with an emphasis on concluding reassessment proceedings before challenging adverse decisions and providing avenues for protective relief if needed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260060